About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-209414 1 (1983-12-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadllg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: '110


                           THE COMPTROLLER USNENAL
   OECISION                OF THE UNITED        STATES
                           WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




   FILE: B-209414                DATE:   December 7, 1983

   MATTER OF:    Eric E. Bahl - General Schedule
                Within-Grade Increase - Pay Retention -
                Repromotion to Prior Position After
   DIQEST:       Demotion - Reconsideration


        A General Schedule employee was reduced
        in grade when he exercised his right
        under 10 U.S.C. S 1586 (1976 & Supp. IV
        1980) to return to a position in the
        United States following overseas duty.
        In accordance with 10 U.S.C. S 1586, as
        implemented by Department of Defense
        Instruction 1404.8 (April 10, 1968), the
        employee was afforded pay retention under
        5 U.S.C. S 5363 (Supp. IV 1980). The
        employee's subsequent repromotion to his
        former grade and step commenced a new
        waiting period for within-grade increases,
        since the constructive increase in pay
        which occurs upon repromotion during a
        period of pay retention is an equivalent
        increase under 5 U.S.C. S 5335(a) (1976
        & Supp. IV 1980); 5 C.F.R. S 531.403
        (1982). B-209414, January 31, 1983,
        62 Comp. Gen.      reversed based on new
        information furnished.

     The issue in this case is whether the repromotion
of an employee to his former position, occurring while the
employee is receiving a retained rate of pay under 5 U.S.C.
S 5363 (Supp. IV 1980), constitutes an equivalent increase
under 5 U.S.C. S 5335(a) (1976 & Supp. IV 1980), and
5 C.F.R. S 531.403 (1982), so as to require the commencement
of a new waiting period for periodic step increases. We
hold that the repromotion of an employee under these circum-
stances constitutes an equivalent increase within the
meaning of the applicable law and regulations, even though
the employee's actual salary remains the same throughout the
period of demotion and repromotion.

     Michael E. George, Acting Personnel Officer, Department
of the Army, Kansas City District, Corps of Engineers,
requests that we reconsider our decision in Eric E. Bahl,
B-209414, January 31, 1983, 62 Comp. Gen. _       That




                         O{7SL

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most