About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-211626 1 (1983-07-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlfw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                  fg~~-~.THE COMPTROLLER GENYERALA?            #~AJd
  OECISION      .      .  OF THE UNITED STATES
                        /  WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548
                   ON IT t


  FILE:   B-211626              DATE: July 19, 1983

  MATTER OF:     J. Michael Tabor--Travel Expenses--
                 Determination of Actual Permanent Duty
                 Station
  DIGEST:
          An employee was paid for his travel and
          subsistence expenses while allegedly on
          temporary duty in Washington, D.C., from
          October 1981 to April 1983. Whether
          a particular location should be consid-
          ered a temporary or a permanent duty
          station is a question of fact to be
          determined from the orders directing the
          assignment, the duration of the assign-
          ment, and the nature of the duties to be
          performed. Under the facts and circum-
          stances of this case, we conclude that
          employee's permanent duty station was
          actually Washington, D.C. He is not
          entitled to temporary duty expenses and
          his agency is directed to determine his
          entitlement to transfer expenses and to
          recoup any overpayments.

                        INTRODUCT ION

     Representatives John D. Dingell, as Chairman, and
Albert Gore, Jr., as Ranking Majority Member, Subcommittee
on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on
Energy and Commerce, by a letter dated May 10, 1983,
requested that we review the claims of Mr. James Michael
Tabor--an employee of the Economic Regulatory Administration
(ERA), Department of Energy (DOE)--for travel expenses while
allegedly on temporary duty from October 1981 to April 1983
away from Dallas, Texas--his designated permanent duty
station. The temporary duty was performted priirily in
Washington, D.C. Our review is undertaken pursw<.t to our
authority to settle accounts and claims set fort.: in
31 U.S.C. SS 3526 and 3702 as codified by s ub. T 7-258,
Septe.aoer 13, 1932, 96 Stat. 377, 964 and 970.
Mr. Tabor and officials representing his j2ncy 'r, given
the opportunity to p:ovide us with their views i:- this
matter. While they indicated a desire to do so, nothing hac-
been received.


/1~

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most