About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-211251 1 (1983-07-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadled0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                         THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                oF THE UNITED STATES
                 -WASHINGTON, 0..C. 20548




FILE: B-211251                 DATE: July 6, 1983

MATTER OF: Civil Aeronautics Board--Denied Boarding
              Compensation Rules

DIGEST:       GAOpis aware of no statute which would prohibit
              airlines from charging Federal agencies which
              requisition space aboard already-full carriers
              not only the fare for the seat or seats
              requisitioned but also the compensation which
              the airlines must pay the bumped passenger.

     The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) requests our opinion
on whether Federal agencies are precluded by any statute or
regulation from paying an airline more than the specified
price of the seat or seats when it makes a mandatory space
requisition that forces the airline to bump a passenger
with confirmed reservations, and pay him appropriate com-
pensation under CAB denied boarding compensation rules.
We are aware of no such prohibition under the circumstances
described.

     On October 7, 1982, the CAB amended its denied boarding
compensation rules, which prescribe minimum standards for the
treatment of airline passengers holding confirmed reservations
who are not accommodated because the airline oversold their
flight, ER-1306, Docket 39932, October 7, 1982. Prior to
this amendment, the rules did not require that the carrier
compensate passengers who were denied boarding due to Govern-
ment requisition of space aboard the aircraft. 14 C.F.R. §
250.6 (1982). The CAB explained its rationale for deleting
this exception to the denied boarding compensation rules as
follows:

     Today, when a Government agency requisitions
     space on an already-full plane, denying com-
     pensation to passengers who are bumped seems
     inconsistent with the broad policy underlying
     these oversales rules. The basic rationale is
     compensation of the passenger, not punishment
     of the airline. Furthermore, the airline need
     not suffer from this change in any event.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most