About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-210805 1 (1983-06-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadldt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                             THU COMPTROLLUN ONSMRALI
    03   1110N             . OTm       uNrITuooN STATKE
                    ~WAHINTON, O. C, 208




    FILE: B-210805                OATE: June 24, 1983

    MATTER OF: Tammermatic Corporation


    DIGEST:

    While GAO will review the award of a contract
    under a grant, GAO will not consider a complaint
    that the grantee failed to permit the prime
    contractor to substitute the complainant's pro-
    duct for one of the products specified in the
    contract, since the matter is one of contract
    administration.


    Tammermatic Corporation haaCsubmitted a complaint
concerning the award of a contract by-the Tri-County
Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TRI-MET)
to Contractors, Inc. for the construction of a new vehicle
maintenance facility, including the installation of a
vehicle wash system. The contract is funded in large part
(80 percent) by a grant from the Urban Mass Transportation
Administration., Tammermatic, a manufacturer of vehicle
wash systems,(complains that TRI-MET failed to permit
Contractors to substitute Tammermatic's product for the
vehicle wash system named in the contract. We dismiss the
complaint.

     TRI-MET issued the solicitation on January 21, 1982,
specifying two manufacturers of vehicle wash systems as
acceptable subcontractors. Certain provisions of the
solicitation allowed that substitution requests for alter-
native wash systems could be made by the prime contractor,
which were to be approved or disapproved by TRI-MET's
architectural consultant in his discretion. Award was made
to Contractors on February 19. That firm filed substitu-
tion requests for the Tammermatic wash system on August 4
and September 29. Both requests were rejected by TRI-MET's
architect because the requests did not show, in accordance
with the prescribed substitution procedures, that the
Tammermatic system substitution was necessary to perform
the contract or would be of substantial benefit to the
contract in terms of ccst, time or other considera-
tions. Tammermat.c complains that the disapprovals were
improper, thereby excluding it from participation in the
contract.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most