About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-206236 1 (1983-06-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlco0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                 0S        THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  DECISION                 oF THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548



  FILE:   B-206236               DATE: June 1, 1983

  MATTER OF: Grover L. Miller


  DIGEST:
          Government employee who uses personal
          funds to procure goods or services for
          official use may be reimbursed if under-
          lying expenditure itself is authorized,
          failure to act would have resulted in
          disruption of relevant program or activ-
          ity, and transaction satisfies criteria
          for either ratification or quantum
          meruit, applied as if contractor had not
          yet been paid. While GAO emphasizes
          that use of personal funds should be
          discouraged and retains general prohibi-
          tion against reimbursing voluntary
          creditors, these guidelines will be
          followed in future. Applying this ap-
          proach, National Guard officer who used
          personal funds to buy food for subordi-
          nates during weekend training exercise
          when requisite paperwork was not com-
          pleted in time to follow normal purchas-
          ing procedures, may be reimbursed.


     The Administrative Officer, Headquarters First Battalion,
152nd Infantry, Indiana Army National Guard, has requested our
reconsideration of the claim of Captain Grover L. Miller for
reimbursement of personal funds he expended to purchase food
supplies. Captain Miller's claim was disallowed by our Claims
Group on October 28, 1981 (Settlement Certificate Z-2828580).
In disallowing the claim, the Claims Group cited the proposi-
tion, embodied in numerous decisions of this Office, that a
Government employee cannot create a valid claim in his favor by
paying an obligation of the United States from his own funds.
E.g., 33 Comp. Gen. 20 (1953). At the outset, we note that the
request for reconsideration was not submitted either by the
claimant or the appropriate agency head as required by
4 C.F.R. § 32.1 (1983). Nevertheless, because we think there
is adequate basis to allow the claim, we will exercise our dis-
cretionary authority to reconsider the settlement action on our
own motion.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most