About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-204409 1 (1983-05-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlbz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                          THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                 OF THE UNITED STATUS
                          WASHINGTON. .C. 20548
                  VNITIP


 FILE:    B-204409              DATE: May 23, 1983

 MATTER OF:     William C. Ragland -'Claim For Salary
                 Retentioni- Res JudicIta

 DIGEST:
            An employee seeks a Comptroller
            General decision on his entitlement
            to salary retention. The General
            Accounting Office adheres to the
            doctrine of res judicata to the effect
            that the valid judgment of a court on
            a matter is a bar to a subsequent
            action on that same matter before the
            General Accounting Office. 47 Comp.
            Gen. 573 (1968). Since in William C.
            Ragland v. Internal Revenue Service,
            Appeal No. 55-81 (C.A.F.C. November 1,
            1982), it was previously decided that
            the employee was not entitled to saved
            pay benefits; the General Accounting
            Office will not consider his claim for
            salary retention.

     Mr. William C. Raglan<seeks a Comptroller General
decision on his entitlement to salary retention. The United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit specifically
decided in this same matter that he was not entitled to
saved pay benefits. Wiliam C. Ragland v. Internal Revenue
Service, Appeal No. 55-81 (C.A.F.C. November 1, 1982). The
issue is whether the General Accounting Office will consider
his claim in light of the previous judgment of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denying it.
We conclude that his claim will not be considered, because
it is barred by our application of the doctrine of res
judicata.

     Mr. Ragland was-an employee of the Internal Revenue
Service in Washington, D.C. When his position was elimi-
nated, he was reassigned to a position at the same grade in
Houston, Texas.- He-believed this position to be a 
which would be abolished after he relocated. Prior to his
reporting for duty in Houston, he accepted a lower-graded
position with 4nother unit of the Internal Revenue Service
in Washington, D.C. He signed a statement indicating that
he voluntarily accepted the lower-graded position.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most