About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-210916 1 (1983-05-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlbw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                           THE COMPTROLLE  GENERAL
  DECISION       .    -.   OF THE UNITED BTATEB
                           WASHINGTON. D.C. 20546




  FILE:   B-210916               DATE:   May 20,19w-

  MATTER OF:     Federal Aviation Academy Instructors


  DIGEST:

        Section 145 of Public Law 97-377, Decem-
        ber 21, 1982, which amends 5 U.S.C.
        S 5546a(a) to provide that certain
        instructors at the Federal Aviation
        Academy are entitled to premium pay, is
        effective from the date of enactment and
        is not retroactive to August 3, 1981, as
        were the original provisions of 5 U.S.C.
        S 5546a(a) added by subsection 151(a) of
        Public Law 97-276. The general rule is
        that an amendatory statute is applied
        prospectively only unless a retroactive
        construction is required by express
        language or by necessary implication.
        Neither the express language or the
        legislative history support the view
        that the amendment made by section 145 is
        retroactively effective.

     This is in response to a request for an advance
decision by the Director of Personnel and Training of the
Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transporta-
tion, as to whether instructors at the Federal Aviation
Academy in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, are entitled to premium
pay retroactive to August 3, 1981. The question arises in
view of the premium pay provisions (5 U.S.C. § 5546a) added
by section 151 of Public Law 97-276, October 2, 1982,
96 Stat. 1186, 1200, as amended by section 145 of Public Law
97-377, December 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1830, 1917. As
explained below, we find that the effective date of the
instructors' entitlement to the premium pay involved is not
earlier than December 21, 1982, the date of passage of the
amendment which included Federal Aviation Academy instruc-
tors under the coverage of the premium pay provision set
forth at 5 U.S.C. § 5546a(a). The statutory language does
not provide that the instructors' entitlement to premium pay
under 5 U.S.C. §' 5546a(a) was to be retroactively effective
nor does the legislative history clearly indicate that such
entitlement was meant to be retroactive.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most