About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-208839 1 (1983-04-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlbb0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                             \TECOMPTROLLER GENEAL<
                  /  -r:  \\THE
  DECISION                  F . o1 THE UNITEO  BTATEg' '
                           WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548




  FILE:   B-208839              DATE: April 22, 1983

  MATTER OF:    Joseph Ralph Hogan


  DIGEST:

          Employee may not be reimbursed for a
          loan assumption fee paid to finance the
          purchase of a residence at his new duty
          station. This fee is a finance charge
          within the meaning of Regulation Z,
          12 C.F.R. 226.4(2), and therefore is not
          a reimbursable real estate expense under
          para. 2-6.2d of the FTR.

     Mr. Joseph Ralph Hogan, an employee of the Department
of Housing and Urban Development, transferred from Tampa,
Florida, to Jacksonville, Florida, where he purchased a
residence on August 22, 1980. As part of the settlement
costs, he paid a loan assumption fee of $419.76, and he
claims reimbursement of this amount.

     Both the employing agency and our Claims Group dis-
allowed reimbursement because the loan assumption fee was a
finance charge under Reg-ulation Z, 12 C.F.R. 226.4(a)
(1980), and therefore not reimbursable under paragraph
2-6.2d of the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR) (FPMR 101-7)
(May 1973). We agree and sustain the Claims Group's disal-
lowance (Z-2831314, August 31, 1982).

     To finance the purchase of the home, Mr. Hogan assumed
the seller's obligation to make monthly payments on the
mortgage loan balance of $41,942.40. The loan assumption
fee of $419.76 was a cost imposed by the mortgage lender to
transfer the loan obligation to Mr. Hogan. He believes that
the loan assumption fee should be reimbursed since it was a
mandatory cost of purchase that was reasonable in amount as
compared to the cost of paying off the loan and obtaining
new financing. In this regard he states that the seller's
mortgage instrument provided for a $1,325 prepayment pen-
alty that would have been due if the loan had been paid off
and he points out that considerably higher closing costs
would have been incurred if he had obtained a new loan.


9J

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most