About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-208855 1 (1983-04-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkzm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: IoIw41


                        -. THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  DECISION          .     OP THE UNITED STATES
                          WASHINGTON, O.C. 2054U
                            4i~iflO                     4137-


  FILE:   B-208855              DATE: April 5, 1983

  MATTER OF:     Travel Expenses Arising from Employee's
                 Fitness for Duty Examination

  DIGEST:

        An employee, who is required to undergo
        fitness for duty examination as a condi-
        tion of continued employment, may choose
        to be examined either by a United States
        medical officer or by a private physician
        of his choice. The employee is entitled
        to reasonable travel expenses in connec-
        tion with such an examination, whether he
        is traveling to a Federal medical facility
        or to a private physician. The agency may
        use its discretion to establish reasonable
        limitations on the distance traveled for
        which an employee may be reimbursed.

    The issue in this decision is whether travel expenses
are payable to a Government employee who chooses to have a
fitness for duty medical examination performed by a
private physician located some distance from his official
duty station, despite the availability of a United States
medical officer at his station. We hold that a Federal
employee who travels to a place within a reasonable distance
from his duty station in order to have a fitness for duty
examination performed by a private physician is entitled to
reimbursement for his resulting travel expenses.

    This decision is in response to a request from
Mr. Frank X. Hamel, a civilian personnel officer with the
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) in Tracy, California.
According to the submission, Federal agency officials may
require an employee to submit to an appropriate fitness for
duty examination when questions arise concerning his physi-
cal or mental ability to continue work in his assigned posi-
tion. Where the agency prescribes that an employee submit
to such an examination, it must give that employee the
option of being examined either at a Government facility, if
one is reasonably available, or by a private physician of
the employee's own choosing.

    A question has now arisen concerning the use of Apxan-
priated funds to pay the travel expenses, including mileage

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most