About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-207094 1 (1983-02-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkws0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


OECISION





FILE: B-207094


MATTER


DIGEST:


THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




      DATE: February   1i, 1983


OF: Consuelo K. Wassink - Time Limitation
    on Return to Place of Residence

In order for employee to be
reimbursed expenses incident to
return travel to former place of
residence, travel must be clearly
incidental to separation and should
commence within reasonable time
thereafter. Employee who resigned
position effective October 2, 1981,
notified agency on March 2, 1982, of
intent to return to former place of
residence commencing on September 23,
1983, and who accepted employment at
location of resigned position does
not meet requirements for reimburse-
ment.


     This decision is in response to a letter from counsel
for Ms. Consuelo K. Wassink, a former employee of the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM), Department of the Interior.
Ms. Wassink is appealing a BLM decision disallowing her
request for prospective authorization for reimbursement of
travel expenses and transportation of household goods for
return travel to Boulder, Colorado, commencing September 23,
1983. The BLM denied her request for the reason that her
return travel would not be clearly incidental to her
separation as required by 28 Comp. Gen. 285 (1948).

     For the reasons stated below, the disallowance by BLM
is sustained.

     Ms. Wassink was given an appointment by BLM effective
June 21, 1975, as a Public Information Officer with the
Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Office (OCS), Anchorage,
Alaska. At the time of her appointment she was a resident
of Boulder, Colorado. She was authorized travel and trans-
portation expenses from Boulder, Colorado, with return
rights, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. S 5722 (1976), and the imple-
menting regulations currently contained in the Federal
Travel Regulations, FPMR 101-7 (September 1981) (FTR).

     In her appeal, Ms. Wassink states, through counsel,
that she believes that her notice of intent to exercise

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most