About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-203658 1 (1982-12-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkuh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: ~'0


                      THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION {..J         ).o F THE UNITED STATES
                       1WASHINGTON. D. C. 20549
                 VN~jITlI0


FILE:    B-203658              DATE: December 20, 1982

MATTER OF:    Mary Helen Coal Company, Inc4


DIGEST:

     A subcontractor under a Government contract
     has no legally enforceable right against the
     Government for funds erroneously paid to the
     assignor prime contractor instead of assignee
     bank, since there is no privity of contract
     between the subcontractor and the Government.


     Mary Helen Coal Company, Inc. claims payment of
 $64,661.20 for coal supplied under contract No. DLA 600-
 79-D-1683 between Mitchell Energy Corporation, a coal
 broker, and the Defense Fuel Supply Center (DFSC). Mary
 Helen was the coal supplier, and the contract was to supply
 coal to a number of Government facilities, most of which are
 operated by the General Services Administration (GSA). We
 deny the claim.

     After award of the contract, Mitchell assigned its
 right to funds due under the contract to United Virginia
 Bank, pursuant to the Assignment of Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.
 S 3727, as codified by Pub. L. No. 97-258 (formerly 31
 U.S.C. § 203), and 41 U.S.C. § 15 (1976) (the Act). There-
 after, Mitchell, the bank, and Mary Helen entered into an
 agreement whereby the bank would deposit in escrow all pay-
 ments to Mitchell received from DFSC and distribute them
 to Mary Helen. Mary Helen made a number of shipments of
 coal for which DFSC forwarded payment directly to Mitchell
 instead of the bank.

     Mary Helen's coal failed to meet the contract specifi-
 cations. GSA nonetheless accepted some shipments, but even-
 tually refused to accept any more nonconforming coal. When
 Mitchell failed to purchase coal elsewhere, the Government
 terminated the contract for default and reprocured coal at a
 higher price. Mary Helen is suing Mitchell in Federal dis-
 trict court for payment of the coal supplied for Mitchell.
 Mitchell, however, is insolvent, and the claim before our
 Office represents Mary Helen's attempt to collect from the
 United States the money that DFSC paid directly to Mitchell
 despite the assignment.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most