About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-209109 1 (1982-12-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadktz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                  T44,I CCMPTRQLLFIRUlINIRAL.
    IS:     ION          +   OF THE 3UNITE         UTATSI
                             WA SHINGTON. 0,0. 2 054



    FILE: B-209109                 DATE: December 15, 1982

    MATTER OF: Andres Tohar - Temporary Duty -
                  Noncomnw'rcial Lodging
    DIGEST:   Employee on temporary duty who lodged
              at the apartment of a private party is
              not entitled to reimbursement of the
              amount paid for lodgings in the absence
              of evidence that the rental agreement
              was the result of an arm',3-length busi-
              ness transaction between the parties,
              or that the expenses were otherwise
              reasonable and within the otandards set
              forth in 52 Comp. Gen. 78 (1972).

     Mr. John A. Murphy, an authorized cortifying officer of
the United States Department of Education, requests a deci-
sion concerning the claim of an employee, Mr. Andres Tobar,
for the expenses of lodging in noncomercial quarters during
a period of temporary duty.   For the reasons stated bclow,
the employee's claim may not be paid.

     Mr. Tobar was authorized to travel from Washington,
D.C., to New York, New York, and return to Washington, D.C.,
from February 1 to February 7, 1981.   During the period of
his temporary duty, Mr. Tohar stayed at the apartment of a
private individual, paying S40 per duy for a total of 8240.
In support of his claim for lodging expenses, Mr. Tobar pro-
vided the agency with a signed receipt from the apartment
owner showing that he received $240 for the employee's
lodgings, together with the owner's signed statement that
Mr. Tobar had the exclusive use of the apartment for the
period February 1 to February 7, 1981, and that the
reasonable utility cost during Mr. Tobar's stay was $15 per
day for a total of ninety dollars.
     The Department of Education denied payment as claimed
because the agency had not authorized a specific per diem
rate in advance under the provisions of paras. 1-8.1h
and i-7.3c of the Federal Travel Regulations, FPMR 101-7
(September 1981) (FTR). Under the rules stated in our
decision Clarence R. Foltz, 55 Comp. Gen. 856 (1976), the
agency determined that the lodging expinses claimed by
Mr. Tobar were not supported by information indicating that
the charges were the result of extra expenses incurred by

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most