About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-207129 1 (1982-08-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkot0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


        -I      I _., ,,
                            TH*1L I 1c3,'fPrI4c3LLX n-P1Oa N LWRAL
                                 or v~irF ;-r4s0'Rjn TAT L1EI




   FILE: B-207129                  DAT'Fr: August 26, 1982

   MATTER OF:     Doris Brissett - Retroactive promotion
                                   and backpay

   OSGEST: Employee, who was promotel 4 weeks before
            she was eligible for within-grade- increace,
            claims retroavtive promotion and backpay,
            Employee alleges that agency violated
            policy of defegring grade promotions until
            eligible employees receive anticipated
            within-grade increases, Claim is denied
            since agency has not established nondis-
            cretionary poliuy described by claimant.
            Disparate treatment of employees similarly
            situated does not provide a bvsis for all
            aggrieved employee's retroactive promotion.
            Rather, the granting of promotions is with-
            in the discretion of agency, whose findings
            shall not be upset except for abuse of
            disuretion.

     Mrs. Doris Brissett, an employee of the Federal Mediation
a.d Conciliation Service (FMCS), appeals our Claims Group's
Settlement Z-2837392, March 22, 1982, denying her claim for
P retroactive step increase and backpay in connection with
her 1977 promotion to grade GS-5. For the reasons stated
below, we affirm the action of the Claims Group.

  * In late 1977, Mrs. Brissott was employed as a GS-4,
Stop 9, Clerk-Typist, with Ff4CS in its Hew York City office.
The record shows that Mrs. Brissett became eligible, on the
basis of time served, for a within-grade (step) increase on
January 16, 1978. However, on December 19, 1977, 4 weeks
before she vas eligible for the step increase, Mrs. Britisett
was promoted to grade GS-5, Stop 7. Since Mrs. Brissett
receiVed her promotion in grade before she became eligible
for her step elevation, she never received the anticipated
wi thin-grade increase.

     Mrs. Brissett correctly states that, if tier gcade
promotion had been delayed until after she had received her
within-grade increase on January 16, 1978, her subsequent









                           I      a                   I


- 'I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most