HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobadkoa0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
%.iAV&1111T
,..- -'V-. \ Tr& VOMPTROL.t fl OLNIZRAL
DECIBICN .d OUNITI3 TATED
.' Al WAD HNUT(NoD C.C. U205481
40
FILE: 203801 DATE: A'igusc 13, 1982
MATTER OF: American Federation of Government Employees
!ocal 1364 -Military Leave or Annual Leave
DIGEST: Advance party of several civilian emplcjee.i
of Carswell Air Force Bae were issued two
sets of orders for active military duty;
one set of orders was for advance duty on
Ihursday and Friday, June 5-6, 19B0, and
the other sel was for regular suMmer camp
duty on June 7-21, 1980. However, after
an audit, the Air Fotce copuited military
leave for those employees as if there was
only ote pericd of active duty and chargud
I day'u annual leave in addition to 15 days'
military leave. The union claims that
military leave should have been canputed
for each tour of duty separately and no
annual leave charged, Since the absence
for military leave was coatinuais and
the weekend of June 7-8 fell wholly within
the period of absence, military leave
must b:. charged for those( days. The union's
claim on behalf of its employees is denied.
This decision is in responue to a request for a
decision filed by James H. Carter, President, American
Federation of Government Empiojees (AFGE) Local 1364,
'on behalf of several civilian employees of Department
of the Air Force, Pursuant to 4 C.FOR. Part 22 (1981)
(originally published as 4 C.F.R. Part 21 at 45 Fed.
Reg. 55689-92, August 21, 1980), t1he Air Force was
served with a copy of, AFGE's request, but has filed 't
written ccanents or response.
The main issue in this case is whether empliojes
must be charged military leave for nonwor]hdays at the
beginning of a second tour of military duty when the
second taar begins the day atter the end of the first
tour of military duty. We hold that the emplearees An
question must be charged military leave for the non-.
workdays at the'beginning of the second tcur of military
duty tinder the circumstances described below.](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobadkoa0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)