About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-201395.3 1 (1982-06-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkky0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                     5</
                 J14P


                                    /, THU CVIIPTFIOLLUR 'JENgRAL
               DECISION               OF THE UNITED STATES
                                -I/S WASHNGTON. C)., C. 0054



               FILEt B-201395,)             DATE: June 23l 1982
               MATTER C)F:' Assoiation of Soil and Foundation Engineers--
                            Second Request for Reconsideration

               DIGEST:
                   Brooks Act procedure for selecting arehi-                 P
                   tectural or engineering firms does not
                   apply to a procurement, even though
                   engineers will be used to perform part
                   of the work, where the prime contractor
                   itself does not have to be an engineering
                   firm to perform the contract successfully.
                   Prior decision is affirmed,

                   The Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers
               (ASFE) has requested reconsideration of our decision
               in Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers--
               r.$cio-isderation, B-20l-s72, May 6, 1982, 61 Comp.
               Gen,    , 82-1 CPD    There we affirmed our decision
               in Aso.iatlon of Soi- ard Foundation Engineers,
               U-201395, July 17, 1981, Ll-2 CPD 43, where wie had
               denied ASFE's protest that Brooks Act (40 US,C. 5 541.,
               et seq. (1976)) procurement procedures should have been
               used by the Federal Highway Administration (FIUWA) in
               procuring centrifuge testing of model pile group founda-
               tions. We stated that the Brooks Act procedures did not
               apply because, even though eng.neers would be used in
               performing the contract, FIIA had reasonably concluded
               that it was unnecessary for the contractor itself to be
               a professional engineering firm in order to pertorm the
               contract successfully.

                   According to ASFE, our decision should be modified
               because it would permit federal agencies to obtain archi-
               tectural and engineering (%-U) irvives from firms which
               are legally forbidden to provide them under state and
               local law. ASFE continues to insist that the scope of the
               Brooks Act should be interpreted so thlt only licensed or
               registered engineers may lawfully respond to work state-
               ments which call for the use of licensed engineers to any
               extent.
,I
:5


*1 qt ,*~

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most