About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199368.3 1 (1982-06-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkkp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
  '         . . .-          .                                   .        V.


            I                           THE COMPTROLL.ER GENERAL
                 flECIBION              OF THE UNITED STATES
                                        WASHINGTON. D. C. 20545
            I7


                 FILE:   B-199368.3           DATE: June 18, 1982

                 MATTER OF: flub Testing Laboratories--Claim for Costs


                 DIGEST:
                 1.  Claim for bid preparation costs is
                     allowed since record establishes that
                     the agency's actions to improperly
                     reject claimant's bid as nonresponsive
                     were arbitrary and capricious, and bid-
                     der would have received award but for
                     the improper agency actions.

                2.   Legal fees incurred in pursuing a bid
                     protest at GAO are not compensable.

                3.   No legal basis exists that allows an
                     unsuccessful bidder to recover antici-
                     pated profits.


                     Hub Testing Laboratories (flub) claims reimbursement
                for $800 in bid preparation expenses it allegedly incurred
                in competing for a contract under invitation for bids
                (IFB) No. R6-8-80-22, a total small business set-aside
                issued by the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service
                for geotechnical analysis of sediment, soil and rock
  -            samples. In addition, fub claims ?l,500 in leal fees
                resulting from its protert against the award of the con-
                tract to another firm, and $a,151 in anticipated lost
                contract profits. For the following reasons, we allow
*              flub's claim for bid preparation expenses, but disallow
1/              its other two claims.
                                    Background


                    We sustained Hub's protest under the IFB in Hub Test-
9/              ing Laboratories, B-199368, September 18, 1980, 80-2 CPD
                204, in which we held that the Forest Service improperly
  * 1rejected Hub's low bid as nonresponsive. In evaluating Hub's
U'              bid, the Forest Service determined that its responses to the
* *~;IFB were inadequate because they merely resti!ted the IFB's







    -., : .. . ,.J:, '  ,  , -        . .. .-, -  I.   :     ' . ... . '

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most