About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-207279.2 1 (1982-06-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkkh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                       IS THU CQMPTflrLLUER 00CNBRAL     ? -
 DECISION              *OF THE UNITED STATEN
                         WAS H IN GTON, 30. Q •26Q54 5



 FILE: B-207279.2              DATE: June 16, 1982
 MATT2-I OF: Roert E. Robocker--Request for Reconsideration

 DIGEST:


      The mere fact that an agency may be will'ng
      to further consider a protest it first rejects
      does not toll the running of the period for
      filing a protest with GAO, and our prior
      decision--holding that a protest was untimely
      since filed more than 10 days aftex the pro-
      tester learned of the initial adverse agency
      action--is affirmed.

      Dr. Robert E, Robocker requests reconsideration of
 our decision in Robert E. Robocker, B-207279, Hay 10,
 1982, 82-1 CPD   , where we dismissed as untimely
 a protest of awa-rd under solicitation No. GS-09B-09212,
 issued by the General Services Administration (GSA)
 for leased office space. We found the protest untimely
 because it was not filed in our Office within 10 working
 days after Dr. Robocker learned that his initial protest
 to the contracting officer had been denied as required
 by our bid protest procedures.

     Dr. Robocker, instead of protesting here, asked GSA
 to reconsider its decision, and f}.led a protest in our
 Office only after GSA denied the protest for a second
 time. Dr. Robocker contends that timeliness should have
been measured from notive of this second denial rather
than the initial denial since GSA offered to reconsider
its initial decision. We do not agree.

     We find nothing in the record which constitutes
 an offer on GSA's part to reconsider its initial denial
 of Dr. Robocker's protest. Even assuming, however,
 that GSA did make such an offer, this fact alone does
 not warrant reversal of our May 10 decision. The
 timeliness proviiions of our procedures are strictly
 construed, J.J. Broderick coMlrn~ , B-204506, November 23,
 1981, 81-2 CPUD 419, and the mere fact that an agency may
 be willing to further consider a protest it first rejects

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most