About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-195347,B-195348 1 (1982-05-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkih0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                        WO
                    9     t     THE COMPT OLLER o 'NERAl/r(/,              /
          D~CIIDN~tt04Pa             THL-aUNIT1313STATEU1
                                WAS H IN GTO N, DC S0*       054013



  FIt.E; f-195347/B-195348             DATE; May 260 1982

  MATTER OF: Reconside-ation of MS3PB's aut)rity to accept
                 reimbursement for hearing officers travel
                 exfenses.
  DIGEST:
            In view of the Merit Systems Protection Board's
            statutory responsibility to provide appeals hearings,
            and absent any specifiv authority to the contrary,
            there is no authority for the MSPf to accept reim-
            bursement for the travel expenses of its hearing
            officers, nor is there any authority for the employing
            agencies to use their appropriatiols foc this purpose.
            59 Ocmp. en. 415 (1980), Which held that IISPB may not
            accept payments from other ayencies or augment its
            appropriations by accepting donations from employees
            or unions, is affirmed.

     We have been asked to reconsider our devision t, 59 Ccmp.
Gon. 415 (1900). In that decision, we held t) at the uerit Systews
Protectitrs Board (MSPB) is prohibited from accepting reimbursement
from Federal agencies, employees, or employees' unions for the travel
exjwnses of tL3PB huIaring officers, For the reasons discussed bela,
we conclude that YS9Ccmp. Gen. 415 must be upheld..

     By statute, the Merit Systems protection Board is responsible
for the adjudication of Federal employees' appeals from agency per-
sonnel actions, The Civil Service Reform Act of 1976 euthorizes tiSPB,
as successor to the Civil Service Canission, to hear, adjudicate, or
provide for the hearing or adjudication of all matters within its
jurisdiction (5 U.S.C. § 1205(a)(1)). Further, 5 U.S.C. § 7701 pro-
vides that a Federal employee or applicant for Federal eployment may
submit an apeal to MSPII from any action appealable to the Board under
any law, rule, or regulation, and that such an appellant has a right
to a hearing.

     The location of these hearings is not specified by statuite, In
our 1980 decision, we: noted that the Board, under its general author-
ity to prescribe regulations necessary for the performance of its
functions (5 U.S.C..f 1205(g)), appears to have inherent authority to
determine where hearings are to be held. 59 Ccmp. oGen. at 416.

     It has been MSPB's preferred practice to conduct appeals hearings
in the appellant's home area. Because the employing agency and wit-
nesses for both the appellant and the agency are typically located in
the same general area, the entire apvals process is, quite logically,
less time consuming and more cost-efficient if conducted in that area.


pp,        I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most