About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-206436.2 1 (1982-05-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkhi0001 and id is 1 raw text is:      - . .... ... id



                                 ,    r. /;.TH   CIMPTROLLIR     AENEFAL
                   DECISION                   T AT19U13
                                   d*                        0..0.-.054U
                                   4,1 Ii   VV 'JA S         0! 01 t4 3 _.. 2o5 914 U



                   j ILE:B-206436,2               DATE: May 10, 1982

                   MATTER oF;Ronald L. Cain, MD.--Reconsideration

                   DIGEBT:

                        Prior decision dismissing protest
                        as untimely is affirmed and will not
                        be reconsidered under 4 C.F.R. § 21.9(b)
                        (1981) since request for reconsideration
                        was not filed within 10 working days after
                        the basis for reconsideration was known or
                        should have been known,


                        Counsel for Ronald L. Cain, M.D. (Cain),
                   requests reconsideration of our decision in the
                   matter of Ronald Le Cain, A lDU-206436, larch 12,
                   1982, 82-1l-CPD-232.-That decLsion concluded that
  .. ,the protest was untimnely and, therefore, our Office
                   would not consider tho merits of Cain's protest
                   against the allegedly unfair evaluation of its pro-
  - ,.             posal and an improper award of contract No. 243-81-
    ..             0029 to P.S., Inc., under a request for proposals
                   issued by the Department of Health and Human
                   Services.
    4
 l.t               -    On April 19, 1982, counsel for Cain filed this
 .                 reconsideration request, which is untimely under our
                   Bid Protest Procedures (4 C.F.R. part 21 (1981)),
                   and, therefore, is dismissed.
                        Our Procedures, 4 C.F.R. S 21.9 (19C1), require
                   that requests for reconsideration be filed within
                   10 working days after the basis for reconsideration
                   is known or should have been known. Since Cain's
                   basis for requesting reconsideration is its disagree-
                   ment with the conclusion of our March 1.2, 1982, decision,
 ,'
                   any request for reconsideration should have been filed
                   here within 10 working days of the date It received
                   our decision. We have held that it is reasonable to
                   assume that a protester will have received our decision
                   within a week of its issuance. Labconco Corporation--
Ii                 Reconsiderttion, B-198284, June 6, 1980, 80-1CPD    s 395.

f   a
SP .



SW t ;II *.      ,    •,                                        ..         -      9. .4
   j. *.'P~ I|  .  '  i ,  &' r'  i   1  li  ,'.qi 4ji. i * ,.,  •I  * .  ..-u, tg  *@  'A '   i''.i4se..m. '..-a  i 4  ,. i .. l .!. f&,lji    ti.fl1.I'q-wf  ,  *   ' t' l ,t.l  ';. r.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most