About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-201395.2 1 (1982-05-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkhe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

   1 71

                              A -..    THE CDMPTRO Lr
                    a ki:':); Mw I  S I- r.  N  0 T    O N I  T   E' r] B V8
                              \WASHINGTiO, 0,,0, ro548



                FILE;  B-201395.2            DATE: 114y 61 1982

                MATTER OF: Association of Soil and Foundaton
                            Engineers--Reconsideration
                DIGEST:
                    Broocs Act provides a procerOure which must
                    be used when an agency is selecting an
                    architectural or engineering (A-E) firm to
                    perform A-N services, This procedure is
                    not applicable in procuring a research con-
                    tract, even though the contractor is expected
                    to use engineers, where it is unnecessary for
                    the contractor itself to be a professional
                    engineering firm to successfully perform the
                    contract.

                    The Association of Soil and FoundatiQn Engineers
               (ASFE) requests reconsideration of our decision in
               Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers, B-201395,
               July 17, 1981, 81-2 CPD 43. In that decision, we denied
               ASFE's protest that Brooks Act (40 U.S.C, § 541, et  0.'
               (1976)) procurement procedures should have been used
  .,1          under request for proposals (RFP) DTFH61-81-R-00034,
               issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
'*             Department of Transportation, for centrifuge testing ci
  * i          model pile group foundations.
                    In its request,-for reconsideration$ ASFE states
    ,          that the RFP specifically estimated that 2600 profes-
    Ssional hours of geotechnical engineering would be
               neededl also, ASFE argues that mechanical engineering
               and electrical engineering were needed to perform the
               contract. Pointing to the Maryland statutes relative
               to engineering as being typical of all State statutes
               on the subject, ASFE argues that under State statutos
 ,,            only a licensed engineer may offer to perform engineering
   I!,         services. Therefore, ASFE argues that our decision should
.              have held that Brooks Act proced~ures applied to this pro-
' •curement.

'I,


~'. *1

                   II
     'N..4

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most