About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199042 1 (1982-03-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkel0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
    --7-

    DECISION
• ..  ,4 N..-          
        De cls~r,    'N1.


FILE;


4 IN


B-199042


MATTER OF:


DIGEST:


T-IL!  tw rO'4R4L r, R ORNERA.
OF TIll UNIDW fITATU3
WASH I N3TOr1#t, D,C- 2OLP4f1


DATE: I!areh 25, 19 2


James W. Byron


An employee is entitled to real estate
expenses for selling his home at his
old duty station only if the home was
his residence when he was first defi-
nitely notified by competent authority
of his transfer to a new duty station.
A Government employee sold his home
and occupied an apartment 6 months before
he received official notice of an appoint-
ment to be a Special Agent with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation. Advice
of an agency recruiter that he stood a
qood chance of appointment and that if
eppointnd he would be transferred to
another duty station after training does
not satisfy the reqviirement that an
employee inust recoive a definite notice
of transfer while residing in the
residence for which he claims selling
expenses.


     The issue in this case is whether the employee's home at
his old duty station was his residence when he was first
definitely notified of his transfer to a new duty station.
Since additional evidence does not show that the employee had
been definitely advised that he would be appointed to a
p3osition with the Federal Bureau of Inv'estigation (FBI) at
the time he sold his residence out decision in Matter of
James _We. By~ron, B-199042, March 3, 1981, is sustaned.

     While an employee of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
in Boston, Massachusetts, Mr. Byron applied for a position
as Special Agent with the FBI.  on January 19, 1977, the FBI
informed him that because it lacked funds no appointments
would be made until after fiscal year 1977, ending Septem-
ber 30, 1977. However, Mr. Eidward P. McNulty, Applicant
Coordinator in the Bureau's Boston Office, strongly suggested
that Mr. Byron would be offered an appointment because of his
previous experience and qualifications. Mr. McNulty
encouraged Mr. Byron to ta1te care of any significant per-
sonal matters that might interfere with accepting a position.


                                                         11


. . ,           . . . . . 9  19.. ~ f.


I - - - I -. 0 .U


f-   $1t f~•'
I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most