About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-203625 1 (1982-02-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkby0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

          DECISONTHE COMPTMOI1vLUR GERNERAL.
   0:  MDEClION              10P    TH1 UNIT           if TATES      
                         _:T    WASHINGTON, D,          , 201548             



   FILEI B,203625                     DATE;     rebi_7uary 22, 1982

   MATTER OF: Staff Sergeant Juan H, Ovalle, USA

   OtWLGBT: Vervice member who 't-vels overseas on a-'foreign air
             carrier when service by a United States gir'carrier
             lo available, in violation of the Fly America Act,
             is, personally liable for the air fare oven though he
             may have been ignorant -of the Act and mieunderscood
             terminology in his travel orders directing the use
             of United States air carriers,

      Staff Vlergeqnt- Juan H, Ovalle, USA' appeals otir Claims Group's
 denial of his claim-for reimbursement for-overseas travel on a. for-
 eign air carr'ier, -AThe issue in this case is whethei Sergeant Ovalle
 may be reimbu'rsed for travel on a foreign air carrie . in violation
 of the Fly Am~rica Act because he was ignorant of the Act and did
 not understand the direction in his travel orders to use United
 States air carriers. The requirement for uve of United States air
 carriers when they are available is imposed directly by statute,
 and all persons.-are charged with knowledge of it, Its application
 is mandatory and may not be waived, Therefore, reimbursement may
 not be allowed,

     Sergeant Ovalle reenlis-ed in the Army in California in June.1980
and was assignad to the Republic of South Korea in July 1980, IHis
travel orders stat.ed Authority is granted to fly at personal expense
by commercial (US'.FLAG) carrier,- le paid $347 for a ticket to Seoul,
Korea, on Japan iilines, a foreign.air carrier, and was denied reim-
bursement by the Army. Sergeanti0valle does not.claim that United
States air catriers were not available, nor does he claim that his
use of a foreign air carrier can be-justified as a matter of necessity
or governmental agroement. These are the exceptions which- apply to
the statutory requirements that Uni.ed-States flag (certificated) air
carriers be-used for transpbrtatiodn4hich is to be paid for by Gov-
ernment funds,  See uection1117 of '-he Federal. A iation Act of 1958,
as added by Public LaW 93-623,.JanuarV 3 .1975v 88 Stat, 2104, and
amended by.section 21'o the International Air Transportation
Competition Act-of 1979, Public' Law 96-192, 94 Stat,-at 43-44,
49 US.C. § 1517, commonly known as the Fly America Act.
Sergeant Ovalle claims that he wasr0t ,ware of the Fly America
Act and that he was not aware that the term US FLAG on his travel
orders restricted his choice of commercial air carriers to United
States air carriers, lie also states that he was not counseled
about the meaning..of the terminology or about the Act's require-
ments before he made his travel arrangements.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most