About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-124720,B-129346 1 (1981-09-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjsz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



OECIE31ON

                     UITE,


FILE: B-124720 and B-129346


MATTER


DIGEST:


                 -- ILIK k Q


TAE!'COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548



       DATE: September 23, 198.1


OF: Authority of General Accounting Office to Withhold
      Taxes on Backpay Judgments Against the~.United States

 In certifying judgments against United States pursuant
 to 31 U.S.C. § 724a, we have no authority to withhold
 any taxes from backpay judgments against United States
 that specify a dollar amount unless judgments specifi-
 cally directs such withholding or parties involved
 agree to deduction of specified amount of withholding
 tax. Although we agree that amounts awarded to employees
 as backpay do constitute taxable wages, we do not
 agree, and cases do not support, Internal Revenue Service
 contention that GAO may withhold money from backpay
 judgments that do not mention withholding. Since our
 authority to certify judgments against U.S. is largely
 ministerial, we cannot certify a judgment for payment
 other than strictly in accordance with its terms.
 B-124720/B-129346, August 1, 1961, affirmed.


     The Comissioner of Internal Revenue asks that we reconsider and
modify our decision (B-124720/B-129346, August 1, 1961) that this
Office is * * *without authority to deduct, or to direct the deduction
of, any amount for income withholding tax from Court of Claims judgments
for salary, unless, of course, the judgment should specifically so
provide. Subsequently (in 44 Comp. Gen. 729 (1965)) we extended
that opinion by holding that our office was similarly without author-
ity to withhold social security taxes from Court of Claims judgments
for backpay and allowances. (Although our Office has never issued a
formal opinion with respect to our authority to withhold from judgments
rendered by District Courts, such judgments are treated in essentially
the same manner.)

     Internal Revenue Service (IRS) considers wages to be taxable
income subject to withholding tax, whether paid voluntarily, under a
settlement agreement, or pursuant to a judgment. Furthermore, IRS
believes that the responsibility of complying with the withholding tax
requirements when backpay judgments are obtained against the United
States rests with the General Accounting Office, since GAO is resp3on-
sible for certifying payment and is in control of the appropriated fund
* * * used to pay such judgments. (At our request, the Assistant
Attorney General, Tax Division, Department of Justice, provided his
views on this matter. He agrees generally with IRS.)

     Having reconsidered this question, it remains our view that our
decision of August 1, 1961, was essentially correct and that unless


r1~Li2


1~ *    -~

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most