About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202842.2 1 (1981-09-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjsu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




              DECISION         2       OF THE UNITED STATES

                                   ,   WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20548




              FILE:        B-202842.2       DATE:   .etee     21- 19.81

              MATTER OF: W. M. Grace, Inc.--Request for
                            Reconsideration

              DIGEST:


                   Where protester reiterates allegations
                   already part of record considered in
                   original protest, request for reconsi-
                   deration of prior decision holding
                   that agency properly cancelled solic-
                   itation is denied.


                   W. M. Grace, Inc., requests reconsideration of our
               decision, W. M. Grace, Inc., B-202842, August 11, 1981,
               81-2 CPD    , in which we denied that firm's protest
               with respect to the cancellation of invitation for bids
               (IFB) No. N62470-81-B-2919 issued by the Department of
               the Navy for janitorial services. In that case, the Navy
               cancelled the IFB, under which Grace was the low bidder,
               on the basis that the IFB's specifications did not reflect
'the Navy's actual needs. We held that Navy's cancellation
              was consistent with the provisions of Defense Acquisition
              Regulation § 2-404.1 which allow post-bid opening cancel-
              lation in certain circumstances, and, therefore, Navy's
              action to cancel and resolicit with proper specifications
              was justified.
i
                   Section 21.9(a) of our Bid Protest Procedures, 4 C.F.R.
               Part 21 (1981), requires that a request for reconsidera-
               tion specify any errors of law made or information not pre-
               viously considered in the protest. In this regard, Grace's
               request for reconsideration merely reiterates previously
               raised allegations that the Navy was made aware by Grace
               of the specification deficiencies prior to the original bid
               opening, and that Navy assured Grace that the specifications
               were correct.

                   Since these allegations were part of the record which
               was considered in the original protest, Grace's request
               provides no basis for considering these matters further.


.34

4                                            I    3fg(

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most