About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-204213 1 (1981-09-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjry0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    ~01LEA 0
                             THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
    -ECISION                 OF THE UNITEO STATES
                   o    .    WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548




    FILE: B-204213                 DATE: September 9, 1981

    MATTER OF: Sharon Daniel - Reimbursement of State
                 Bar Membership Dues

    DIGEST:      Attorney employed by Internal Revenue
                 Service may not be reimbursed for State
                 bar membership dues since bar dues are
                 a personal expense and are not payable
                 from appropriated funds. 5 U.S.C. § 5946
                 (1976); 51 Comp. Gen. 701 (1972).

     This is in response to a request for an advance deci-
sion from Mr. G. J. Pellon, an authorized certifying officer
with the Southeastern Regional Office of the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS). Mr. Pellon has asked whether he may certify
for payment a voucher submitted by Ms. Sharon Daniel, an
attorney employed by the IRS in Greensboro, North Carolina,
for reimbursement of State bar membership dues in the amount
of $75.

     Ms. Daniel is not entitled to reimbursement of her
North Carolina State bar membership dues. Section 5946 of
title 5, United States Code, provides that an agency cannot
use its appropriated funds to pay an employee's membership
fees or dues in a society or association, except as author-
ized by a specific appropriation, by the express terms of a
general appropriation, or by sections 4109 and 4110 of title
5 (training expenses).

     Ms. Daniel makes the argument that she should be reim-
bursed her bar dues because the dues are required by North
Carolina statute and one of the requirements of her job is
that she remain a member of the bar in good standing. We
have held repeatedly that fees incident to obtaining permits
or licenses necessary to qualify a Federal employee to per-
form the duties of a position are personal expenses for which
appropriated funds are not available. 31 Comp. Gen. 81
(1951) and cases cited therein.

     We have applied this principle to cases virtually iden-
tical to the present one, holding that bar membership is a
matter of personal qualification, and that appropriated funds
cannot be used to pay the expenses a Federal attorney incurs

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most