About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-203511 1 (1981-08-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjqp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                             DEC iON  THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
               DECISION               •OF THE UNITEO STATES
                                        WAS H IN GTO N . DC. 20548
                                L'ITEV


               FILE:      B-203511           DATE: August 14, 1981

               MATTER OF:
               M    E     :Department of the Interior in re-Jim Cooley
                               Construction, Inc.
               DIGEST:
                     Bid may not be increased to correct subcon-
                     tractor's omission of item in its quotation
                     alleged after bid opening where bidder pre-
                     sents no evidence of alleged mistake or that
                     subcontractor intended to include omitted item
                     in its quotation at time it was made.


                     The Department of the Interior requests an opinion
                regarding a mistake in bid alleged to have been made by
                Jim Cooley Construction, Inc. (Cooley), the low bidder
                under invitation for bids No. (IFB) W56-133/BII. Cooley
                seeks to have its bid increased because of the alleged
                mistake. The existing record does not provide a basis
                for the requested correction.

                     The IFB sought bids for a contract to remodel dor-
                mitory buildings at the Riverside Indian School, Anadarko,
                Oklahoma. In preparing its bid on the project, Cooley
                requested a quotation for plastering services from
                a potential subcontractor, Stag Plastering. According
                to Cooley, Stag Plastering provided a quotation of
                $92,350. Based on this amount, Cooley submitted a
                bid of $1,184,000 for the project. Cooley alleges that
                shortly before bid opening, the subcontractor called
                and stated it had omitted the furring item from its
                quotation and that it was necessary to raise its quo-
                tation to $122,585 (that is $30,235 more than the
                original quotation). Cooley tried to send a telegram
                increasing its bid by $30,000 to reflect the changed
                quotation, but the telegram was not received by the
                agency prior to bid opening and therefore could not
                be considered with the bid. Contending that the
                $30,000 omission constitutes a mistake in bid, Cooley
                requests that its bid be increased by that amount to
                correct the omission.





:1                                       l7

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most