About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-201688.2 1 (1981-08-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjpq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






DECISION





FILE: B-201688.2

MATTER OF:    M(
              R


THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548




      DATE:   August 6, iq8i


onarch Enterprises, Inc.--
econsideration


DIGEST:


      Because agency report to GAO (furnished
      to protester for comment) enumerated
      proper bases for sustaining solicitation
      cancellation upon which GAO relied in
      prior decision, GAO did not improperly
      raise own bases to validate cancellation
      and protester had opportunity to argue
      its case; therefore, prior decision is
      affirmed.


               Monarch Enterprises, Inc. (Monarch), requests that
          we reconsider our decision in Monarch Enterprises, Inc.,
          B-201688, June 15, 1981, 81-1 CPD 483. In that deci-
          sion, we held that the United States Army Corps of
          Engineers (Corps) properly canceled an invitation for
          bids after bid opening because--even though the stated
          basis for cancellation (ambiguous specifications) was
          questionable--the underlying contemporaneous reasons
          and subsequently advanced reasons (e.g., revised specifi-
          cations) supported the cancellation under the procure-
          ment regulations. We further held that even though the
          basis originally advanced may have been erroneous, a
          subsequently enunciated basis which would have supported
          cancellation had it been advanced originally is acceptable.

               Monarch states that our Office had no authority to
          change the contracting officer's basis for cancellation
          and, in so doing, Monarch was unfairly denied an oppor-
          tunity to argue the merits of the changed bases set
          forth in our decision. Monarch further notes that
          our decision ignored the fact that Monarch could not
          ascertain the exact reason for the cancellation because
          the agency considered and eventually discarded several
          reasons for cancellation before citing a basis (ambiguous
          specifications) we found to be questionable. Finally,
          Monarch requests that the contracting officer be asked
          to amend the cancellation determination to reflect
          proper grounds.


                        7-               7
)                                            iI,  i


_ , , ,  . _'. a.!. , -r- --_ I
          'a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most