About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202564 1 (1981-07-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjow0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



               /i     - THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
.ECIS1ON.,       OF THE UNITED STATES
                        WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548


FILE:  B-2

MATTER 0


DIGEST:


02564


DATE:


July 31, 1981


F:  Mr. Robert Voigt


Civilian employee whose regular workweek
includes Sunday, may not take military
leave under 5 U.S.C. S 6323(a) (1976) to
attend weekend Navy Reserve drills since
employee, as a member of a Reserve com-
ponent of the Armed Forces, is entitled to
military leave under section 6323(a) only
if he is on active duty under 10 U.S.C.
S 270(a) (1976), and drills are inactive
duty.


        This action is in response to a request for an advance
   decision from the Finance and Accounting Officer, Tooele
   Army Depot, Tooele, Utah. The request concerns whether
   Mr. Robert Voigt, an Army civilian employee and a member of
   the Naval Reserve, is entitled to have his absence from his
   civilian job during a day designated as a Reserve drill
   charged to military leave. As is explained below, the answer
   is no.

        Mr. Voigt received orders requiring him to report for
   12 days of training at the Naval Air Station in San Diego,
   California, commencing on July 14, 1980, and extending
   through July 25, 1980. Although the orders indicated that
   the duty was annual active duty for training, they also stated
   that the designated travel day was July 11, 1980, and that
   Mr. Voigt was to receive weekend drill pay for Saturday,
   July 12, and Sunday, July 13.

        Mr. Voigt's regular workweek is other than Monday through
    Friday and both Friday, July 11, and Sunday, July 13, were
    regular workdays while Saturday, July 12, was a regular non-
    workday. The records indicate that Mr. Voigt reported to the
    Naval Air Station on Friday, July 11, and he was granted
    military leave from work for that day because he was in a
    military travel status. The issue presented here is whether
    Mr. Voigt is also entitled to receive military leave for
    Sunday, July 13, a regular workday for which he was receiving
    drill pay.

        Military leave for civilian employees of the Federal
    Government is authorized by 5 U.S.C. § 6323 (1976), which,
    during the period in question, stated in part:

/?lCia)                                      s    iX /o      -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most