About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-203104 1 (1981-07-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjnp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                             THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
     DECISION                 OF THE UNITED STATES
                           f  WASHINGTON, 0..C. 20548
                      LINIT.P


     FILE: B-203104                DATE: July :, 1981

     MATTER OF: Travel and Relocation Expenses for New
                  Appointees to the Federal Bureau of
                  Investigation
     DIGEST:
             1. Director of FBI requests reconsideration
                 of ruling in Cecil M. Halcomb, 58 Comp.
                 Gen. 744 (1979), that new appointees
                 assigned to training in Washington,
                 D.C., may not have Washington designated
                 as first permanent duty station so as to
                 entitle them to travel and relocation
                 expenses from Washington, D.C., when
                 assigned to permanent duty station after
                 training. No basis exists to alter this
                 ruling since assignment for training is
                 not a permanent assignment, and employee
                 must bear expense of reporting to his
                 first permanent duty station.

             2. New appointees initially assigned
                 to training in Washington, 6.C., are
                 responsible for bearing expense of
                 reporting to their first permanent
                 duty assignments following training.
                 FBI may not lessen that responsibility
                 by assigning them to 1 month of so
                 called permanent duty at convenient
                 location following completion of train-
                 ing and prior to intended permanent
                 duty assignment. One month assignment
                 following training should be treated
                 as temporary duty en route to first
                 duty station.

     The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) has asked us to reconsider the ruling in Cecil M.
Halcomb, 58 Comp. Gen. 744 (1979). Specifically, he asks
whether the Halcomb ruling, that a new appointee assigned to
training in Washington, D.C., may not have Washington desig-
nated as his first permanent duty station, must be applied to
FBI appointees. If this ruling necessarily applies, he asks
whether new FBI appointees may be assigned to permanent duty
at their place of appointment for as little as 1 month
following initial training and, upon transfer to a new
permanent duty station, be granted relocation expenses
payable to an individual transferred for the benefit of
the Government. We find no basis to alter the Halcomb

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most