About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-201746 1 (1981-06-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjna0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                    c~
                    4

DECISION
              o
                 UN IT~9


B-201746


YHE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548




      DATE: June 26, 1981


BAQ for Coast Guard Members on Sea Duty


Proposed amendment to Coast Guard regulations
to authorize continuance of basic allowance
for quarters (BAQ) to members without depend-
ents, performing periods of temporary duty
away from a permanent duty station to which
they will return (temporary additional duty
(TAD)) aboard a vessel at sea for 3 months
or more is not authorized. 37 U.S.C'. 403(c)
prohibits payment of BAQ to members on
sea duty but provides that duty for a period
of less than 3 months will not be considered
sea duty. That provision makes no distinc-
tion between temporary and permanent duty.
Neither the statute nor the implementing
Executive orders issued under 37 U.S.C. 403(g)
define sea duty in a way to exclude TAD in
Coast Guard vessels from definition of sea
duty, nor do they permit the service Secretaries
to define sea duty differently.


     This action is in response to a request from the Comptroller
of the Coast Guard as to whether Coast Guard regulations may be
amended to permit payment of a Basic Allowance for Quarters (BAQ)
to members performing sea duty in the circumstances described in
the submission.

     It is stated that the Coast Guard would like to amend its
regulations to permit all members without dependents performing
temporary additional duty (that is temporary duty after which
they will return to the same permanent duty station) aboard a
vessel to continue to receive BAQ, if previously entitled,
regardless of the length of the temporary duty. To permit this
it is proposed to amend the Coast Guard regulations to, in
effect, exclude such temporary duty performed by such members
from the definition of sea duty. It is our view that the pro-
posed amendment would not be in accord with the applicable
statute and Executive orders.

     The request for such amendment has apparently arisen
because of problems encountered by members, without dependents,
who are required to perform such temporary additional duty. It
is reported that governing regulations require such a member's
entitlement to BAQ to be temporarily discontinued during
periods of temporary duty aboard a vessel, if the period




                   /~~~ 7L~h/                           ~.s It'


FILE:


MATTER OF


DIGEST:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most