About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-198448.3 1 (1981-06-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjmy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

4 , , ,-


                       ~THE COMPTPOLLER GENERA L
DECISION                OF THE UNITED STATES
                        VV WASHIINGT 0 .C 2 0548a


FILE: B-198448.

MATTER OF:


3


DATE:


June 24, 1981


Federal Energy Regulatory Commission--
Reconsideration


OIGEST:


      Decision holding solicitation provision
      which precludes use of electronic tape
      recording devices as method of steno-
      graphic reporting is unduly restrictive
      of competition is affirmed where agency
      has presented no new factual grounds
      showing exclusion is reasonably related
      to agency's needs. Objectionable features
      of reporting system are not shown to be
      inherent in recording devices and concern
      matters of bidder responsibility which may
      be specified or proscribed in solicitation.


      The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
 requests reconsideration of a portion of our decision
 in North American Reporting, Inc.7 Ace-Federal Reporter,
 Inc., B-198448, November 18, 1980, 60 Comp. Gen.
 (1980), 80-2 CPD 364, in which we sustained protests
 against deficiencies in FERC invitation for bids (IFB)
 No. FERC-80-B-0001 for stenographic reporting services.
 In so doing, we held that the IFB provision that
 (e)lectronic tape recording devices are not acceptable
 in administrative proceedings before Administrative Law
 Judges, protested by North American Reporting, Inc.
 (NAR), was unduly restrictive of competition. The FERC
 asks that we reconsider only this issue and, alternatively,
 requests a detailed explanation of the factors which an
 agency may properly consider in determining its specific
 stenographic needs for administrative hearings and the
 method of accommodating those needs.

     The FERC has presented no new factual grounds
demonstrating that our earlier decision was erroneous,
but asserts that our assessment of the record before us
was in error due to allegedly erroneous findings of fact,
resultant legal conclusions and application of pertinent

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most