About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199944 1 (1981-04-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjhs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                            THE COMPTROL        GENERAL
    DECISION      .    '    OF THE UNITED STATES
                            WAS H I N GTO N  0. C. 2054 8



   FILE:  B-199944            .   DAE, ,   April lp-1981

   MATTER OF: John G. arty - Relocation Expense, 2Tax
                 Service Fee~

   DIGEST: Employee who purchased residence incident to
            transfer was charged by the lender a tax ser-
            vice fee which was not listed as a finance
            charge on the Truth-in-Lending Statement. The
            fee for a tax search to be performed periodi-
            cally throughout the term of the mortgage to
            check for tax delinquencies and liens is a
            finance charge and may not be reimbursed under
            paragraph 2-6.2d of the Federal Travel Regula-
            tions, even though otherwise characterized by
            the lender.

     The issue presented in this case is whether a tax
service fee is a finance charge and thus not reimbursable
under the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR)(FPMR 101-7,
May 1973) where the Truth-in-Lending Statement provided
the buyer by the lending institution does not list the
tax service fee as a finance charge. Although not so
characterized by the lender, such fee is actually a finance
charge and may not be reimbursed under paragraph 2-6.2d of
the FTR.

     This matter, although presented here by an authorized
certifying officer of the Western Relgion of the lnternal
Revenue Service, is in effect an appeal from our Claims
Division's settlement denying Mr. /John G. Barry's claim
for real estate expense reimbursement. Mr. Barry, an
employee of the Phoenix _pistrict of the Internal Revenue
Service, purchased ah6me incident to a permanent change    0-6
of station. A tax service fee in the amount of $16.50 D)O
paid to the Transamerica Real Estate Tax Service is shown
as an item of expense to be paid by Mr. Barry and his wife
on the settlement statement from the lender, Maricopa Fed-
eral Credit Union, Phoenix, Arizona. The Truth-in-Lending
Statement given to the Barrys lists the tax service fee v.4
among those charges not a part of finance costs.  In  I)
view of the lender's characterization of the tax service
fee, the certifying officer asks that we reconsider our
Claims Division's determination that the fee is a finance
charge which may not be reimbursed under the FTR. In
urging favorable reconsideration of Mr. Barry's claim,
the certifying officer points out that a tax service fee



                                 qiiii'

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most