About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-200283 1 (1981-04-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjhm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
       I
3.~    j.


MATTER


DIGEST:


THE COMPTR7LLER cNERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGT0N  0  C  20548




       DATE: April 15, 1981


OF: Payment /of Front Pay. Court Judgment
      against GPO

 As a result of an employment discrimination suit
 brought by certain female employees, the Govern-
 ment Printing Office (GPO) was ordered in a court
 judgment to pay the plaintiffs back pay for past
 economic harm and an added increment of pay above
 that to which they were otherwise entitled, for
 continuing economic harm until a certain number
 of plaintiffs were promoted. The so-called award
 of front pay in this instance amounts to damages
 and should be paid from the permanent indefinite
 appropriations provided in 31 U.S.C. § 724a.
 Agency appropriations are not available to pay
 compensation above the amount prescribed for the
 particular job level in question. 55 Comp. Gen.
 1447 (1976) is distinguished.


     The Acting Public Printer has requested a decision from this
Office concerning the source of payment of one element of a judg-
ment against the Government Printing Office (GPO). A class action
suit was initiated by certain GPO female employees, hereafter
referred to as plaintiffs, under the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as
amended, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1) and Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.§§ 2000e et seg. alleging that
they had sustained economic loss from GPO discriminatory employment
practices. In Thompson v. Boyle, 499 F. Supp. 1147 (1979), the
court found for the plaintiffs and rendered a judgment in their
behalf. Among other things, the judgment awarded the plaintiffs
back pay on a pro-rata basis in a lump sum, representing the
difference in pay the class as a whole would have received had
50 percent of its members been promoted to the next higher position,
less the pay the class as a whole actually received. In addition,
the court awarded what it termed front pay, which amounts to an
added increment of pay over each class member's current pay for
each future pay period after the date of the judgment until such
time as GPO is able to promote members of the class into a
designated number of higher grades.






                                                  q 3i


DECISION





FILE: B-200283


C>_   %

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most