About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-195820.2 1 (1981-03-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjek0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                              i/


                           TH EUCMTRL ER GENERAL
   DECISION               OF THE UNITED       STATES
                           WAS HI NGTO N .   .c. 20548



   FILE:       B-195820.2       DATE: March 5, 1981

   MATTER OF:      Utah Foam Products, Inc.--
                  [Request for Reconsideration
   DIGEST:

        Protest ground not considered in prior
        decision, that specification excluding
        urethane foam insulation from roofing
        project, except for urethane composite
        board, is unduly restrictive,,is without
        merit and prior decision is affirmed
        where agency makes prima facie showing
        that specification is reasonably related
        to its needs and protester does not
        prove otherwise.

        Utah Foam Products, Inc. (Utah) a supplier of
    spray-applied urethane foam insulation (SUF), requests
    reconsideration of our decision, Utah Foam Products, Inc.,
    B-195820, April 3, 1980, 80-1 CPD 249, which denied the
    firm's protest. The protest concerned the alleged
    restrictiveness of the Army Corps of Engineers' inter-
    pretation and implementation of its construction guide
    specification to exclude the use of Utah's product in
    the repair, insulation and reroofing of six warehouses at
    the Defense Depot, Ogden, Utah. The guide specification
    provides that, except for composite board, insulation ure-
    thane is not permitted on a steel roof deck, which is
    the type of deck present in four of the six buildings.
    We affirm our prior decision.

        Our prior decision never reached the restrictiveness
    issue because we found that Utah was unwilling to comply
    with other specification requirements which we believed
    were included in the specification as a result of the
    Corps' reasonable exercise of its technical judgment of
    the project's total requirements. For example, specifi-
    cation No. 5566 required the removal of all layers of
    the existing bituminous, or built-up, roof system (BURS)







IIJ260

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most