About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199526 1 (1981-02-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjdj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


         -                                        /710X)

                                     ' THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
               DECISION         57; t OF THE UNITED        STATES
                                      W A S H ING TO0N, 0.C. 20548




               FILE: B-199526                DATE: February 23, 1981

               MATTER OF: Donnie W. Daniels - Funeral Travel
                            ExpensesJ

               DIGEST: In the absence of a statute express-
                        ly authorizing payment, the costs of
                        travel incurred by an employee, who
                        traveled as the official representa-
                        tive of his station on official trav-
                        el orders to attend the funeral of a
                        deceased son of a fellow employee,
                        are not reimbursable, not having been
                        incurred while traveling on official
                        business.

                   This matter concerns the appeal by Mr. Donnie W.
              Daniels of his claim for travel expenses incurred in
              connection with his attendance at the funeral of the
-4             son of a fellow patrol officer of the U.S. Customs
               Service, Department of the Treasury.

                   Customs Patrol Officer Daniels was issued a travel
               order authorizing the reimbursement of travel expenses
               to be incurred by him in attending the funeral of the
               son of a supervisory patrol officer. He was told that
               he would be sent as the official representative of the
               Deming, New Mexico Station, in travel status. He attended
               the funeral under travel orders with the approval of the
               Patrol Director and was reimbursed for the travel expenses
               incurred. It is also reported that, while on the travel
               in question, Mr. Daniels visited post personnel and dis-
               cussed customs patrol officer matters with the station
               supervisor.

                    Subsequently, the Customs Service states, it was
               realized that the travel order approving this expense
               was outside the scope of authority granted the autho-
               rizing official by the applicable law and regulations.
               Mr. Daniels was, therefore, advised that he is required
               to repay the amount paid to him for travel expenses.

                    Mr. Daniels' claim must be denied because the travel
               expenses in question could not lawfully be approved by the
               authorizing official. We so held in B-166141, February 27,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most