About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186034 1 (1976-04-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiym0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





          I r L V            OF THE      UNED        STA'TES
                         -.   WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548




 FILE:   B-186034                   DATE: April 27, 1976

 MATTER OF: United Terminals Inc.


 DIGEST:

     Protest based upon refusal of agency to extend
     closing date for receipt of proposals filed in
     GAO after closing date is untimely under § 20.2(b)(1)
     of Bid Protest Procedures and therefore not for con-
     sideration.


     United Terminals Inc. (United) protests the refusal of
Headquarters, United States Army Military Traffic Management
Command, to extend the February 27, 1976, closing date for
receipt of proposals. United also contends that its firm was
afforded 30 percent less time to submit its best and final
offer than its competitor which prevented proper evaluation of
computer priuL out on reduction of prices.

     Request for proposals (RFP) DAHC24-76-R-0003 for stevedoring
services was issued on October 24, 1975, and offers were opened
on December 29, 1975. Revised proposals-were submitted on
February 2, 1976, and best and final offers were required by
12:00 noon on February 27, 1976. The contracting officer reports
that in a telephone conversation held on February 19, 1976,
United was advised of the February 27, 1976, final cutoff date
as well as of the fact that negotiations would be conducted with
its firm on February 24, 1976.

     The record discloses that during the February 24, 1976,
negotiations with United Terminals, Mr. David Richman of the
firm requested more time to submit a revised proposal, stating
that his competitor, Universal Maritime, with whom negotiations
were conducted on February 23, 1976, had approximately 30 percent
more preparation time to prepare its revised proposal. However,
Mr. Richman advised that he could submit his final proposal
by February 27, 1976, if necessary but that he would like some
additional time. Mr. Richman's request for additional time
was denied and it was agreed that United would submit its best
and final offer by the scheduled closing time. The record dis-
closes that United did, in fact, submit a revised proposal on
February 27. 1976, without filing any objection to the closing
date.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most