About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-198202 1 (1980-12-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaditq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                        THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                OF   THE   UNITED STATES
                         WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548



FILE:    B-198202             DATE:   December 29, 1980

MATTER  OF:   Thomas E. Witter v. Pennsylvania National
              Guard, 462 F. Supp. 299 (1978 a LAvailability
              of funds  o reimburse state tfi cost of
DIGEST:       judgment

        Appropriated funds under 31 U.S.C. 724a
        or otherwise are not available to reimburse
        the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania the cost
        of judgment in Witter v. Pennsylvania
        National Guard, where the United States
        was not a party to the suit. The judgment
        was against the state as employer which
        improperly refused to reinstate National
        Guard civilian employee to his former
        position upon his release from active duty.

     By letter dated March 21, 1980, Lieutenant General
La Vern E. Weber, USA, Chief, National Guard Bureau,
requested an advance decision as to whether appropriated
funds are available to reimburse the Camonwealth of
Pennsylvania the amount of $5,326.53 which it paid as
damages pursuant to a judgment in the case of Thomas C.
Witter v. Pennsylvania National Guard, 462 F. Supp.
299 (1978). Although the United States was not named
a defendant in that case we are asked whether funds
are available for reimbursement to the state in view
of the fact that the Federal Government provides the
funds for technicians salaries and since an adjutant
general of a state National Guard has been held to
be an agent of the United States pursuant to the
National Guard Technicians Act of 1968, 32 U.S.C.
709 in matters concerning the employment of such
technicians. See Chaudoin v. Atkinson, 494 F. 2d 1323,
1329 (3d Cir. 1972). The Bureau asserts that the United
States was an appropriate party to the action and
that the judgment would have run against the United
States, but for the failure of the Adjutant General
of the Pennsylvania National Guard-to request Federal
representation by the Department of Justice in the
judicial proceeding. The Bureau also suggests the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most