About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-197209 1 (1980-10-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadipi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          -~~i -                       AJC<



                             THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
     DECISION                OF  THE   UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON. 0.C. 20548




     FILE:     B-197209            DATE:  October 6, 1980

     MATTER   OF:   McCaleb Associates, Inc.--Reconsideration


     OIGEST:                                       7



           Prior decision dismissing protest
           against procurement without preference
           for Indian-owned business in violation
           of Buy Indian Act, 25 U.S.C. § 47 (1976),
           as untimely is affirmed. Alleged absence
           of agency regulations implementing act
           does not constitute supervening circum-
           stance which would constitute good cause
           and excuse protester's delay, following
           adverse agency action on timely protests
           to procuring agency, in filing subsequent
           protest with GAO.

           McCaleb Associates, Inc., requests reconsideration
      of our decision in McCaleb Associates, Inc., B-197209,
      September 2, 1980, 80-2 CPD  I , dismissing as untimely
      its protest that the Department of the Interior, Bureau
      of Indian Affairs' solicitation and award of a contract
      for engineering services without preference for Indian-
      owned businesses was in violation of the Buy Indian Act,
      25 U.S.C. § 47 (1976). We also declined to consider the
      firm's claim for proposal preparation costs which would
      have recuired consideration of the same issues we found
      untimely protested.

          McCaleb concedes that the protest is untimely but
      contends that the Bureau of Indian Affairs has not
      adopted regulations implementing the act; the absence
      of regulation confused and complicated the firm's
      response to the procurement and was the real cause of
      the untimely filing of the protest. We do not, however,
      believe that the circumstances warrant invoking the
      good cause exception to our timeliness standards under
      which an otherwise untimely protest may be considered
      on the merits. 4 C.F.R. § 20.2(c) (1980).



.11 v

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most