About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-197025 1 (1980-07-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiks0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                         ~ < THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
    DEZISICN                     O F  THE UNITED STATES
                                 W AVASHi.NGTON. D      C   205  S




    FILE:   B-197025                    DATE:  July  18,  1980

  v1AATTER OF: Betty J. Beasley, et.al., - Pay rate upon
                   promotion while receiving saved pay

    DIGEST:   Employees accepted downgrade from grade GS-6, step 9,
               to grade GS-5, step 10, in order to enter Upward
               Mobility Program. Their entitlement to saved pay
               under 5 U.S.C. § 5337 (1976) does not preclude consid-
               eration of highest previous rate when employees are
               subsequently promoted to grade GS-7. See 5 U.S.C.
               § 5334(b) (1976).

      This decision is in response to a request from D. R. Newberry,_75
 Finance and Accounting Officer, U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Materiel
 Readiness Command (Army Command), concerning the proper rate of pay
 for employees promoted while receiving saved pay The issue is
 whether the agency may use the highest previouY rate rule when pro-
 moting an employee who had previously .been downgraded and found to
 be entitled to saved pay.

      The report from the Army Command states that in December 1976,
 several employees accepted a change to a lower grade from grade GS-6,
 step 9, to grade GS-5, step 10, in order to enter an Upward Mobility
 Program.  These employees were found to be entitled to saved pay for
 up to 2 years under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5337 (1976). After
 the successful completion of 1 year in the Upward Mobility Program,
 these employees were then promoted to the grade GS-7 level. The
 Army Command's Civilian Personnel Office used the highest previous
 rate rule for these promotions and determined that their highest rate
 pf pay (grade GS-6, step 9, $14,061 per annum) fell between steps 5
 and 6 of grade GS-7. Therefore, these employees were promoted to
 grade GS-7, step 6 ($14,391 per annum), and their entitlement to:
 saved pay terminated. See 5 U.S.C. § 5337(a) (1976).

      The Army Command's Legal Office questioned the use of the highest
  revious rate rule since under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5334(b)
  an employee receiving saved pay is entitled upon promotion to basic
_pay two steps above the rate he would be receiving but for saved pay
-(in this case a rate in grade GS-7 two steps above grade GS-5, step
10)  or his existing rate of basic pay, if higher. The Legal Office
  etermined that a two-step increase trom GS-5, step 10, would be
  $13,611 per annum which falls between steps 4 and 5 of grade GS-7,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most