About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196218.2 1 (1980-07-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadikq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                      -  THE C0MPTq0LLE~q   GENTAL
DIECISION                O3F THE   UNITED STATES
                         WA SH.NGTON, D C      20 58



FILE:, B-196218.2             DATE: July 17, 1980

MATTER  OF:   Porta Power Pak, Inc. -- Reconsideration


DIGEST:

      Prior decision is affirmed where &equest for
      reconsiderationfails to advance factual or
      legal grounds upon which reversal would be
      warranted.

      Porta Power Pak, Inc. (Porta Power) requests re-
 consideration of our decision in Porta Power Pak,
 Inc., B-196218, April 29, 1980, .80-1 CPD 305, in which
 we denied the firm's protest that invitation for bids
 DLA400-79-B-3465 for portable power distribution
 systems for the Department of the Navy issued by the
 Defense General Supply Center contained proprietary
 data.. Porta Power had contended that it.submitted the
 data to the Government in 1971 in connection with a
 mobile power distribution system that it had developed,
 and that the submission was accompanied by a -re'strictive
 legend.  However, we were unable to conclude that
 Porta Power actually had established the confidential-
 ity of its data when it was submitted, or presently had
 demonstrated the uniqueness of its design, i.e., that
 the data could not independently be obtained from
 publicly available literature or common knowledge.

       In its request for reconsideration, Porta Power
 states that it has tape recordings of 1973 telephone
 conversations with Navy personnel and other documen-
 tation which show that at least at that time even
 the Navy considered the subject data to be proprietary
 to Porta Power.  The firm also essentially reiterates
 its basis for protest.

      We first point out that section 20.9(a) of our Bid
 Protest Procedures, 4 C.F.R. part 20 (1980), requires
 that a detailed statement of the factual or legal
 grounds which allegedly warrant reversal of a decision
 of our Office be submitted within 10 working days after
 the basis for reconsideration is known or should have
 been known; the mere statement that evidence to support

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most