About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-197428 1 (1980-06-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiht0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
    DECISION                     OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                                 VWASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




   FILE:   B-197428                    OATE: June 5,1980

   MATTER OF: George L. Kruchko -      everance Pay


   DIGEST: Employee is not entitled   to severance pay, since he
              was discharged for failure to report on temporary
              detail of 4 weeks. Although there is entitlement to
              severance pay if employee is separated because he
              declines assignment to another commuting area, as
              provided in 5 C.F.R. § 550.705, the meaning of this
              term is a permanent change of station ordered by the
              employing agency and not a temporary detail.

     Mr. George L. Kruchko, a former employee of the Forest Service,
requests that we reconsider his claim for severance pay. Our Claims
Division disallowed the claim by Settlement Certificate No. Z-2817701,
November 28, 1979.

     The issue is whether, for entitlement to severance pay,
Mr. Kruchko was separated from employment with the Forest Service
because he refused an order to report for an assignment to another
commuting area.  This issue arises because one of the qualifications
for severance pay is that the employee be involuntarily separated
from the service, not by removal for cause on charges of misconduct,
delinquency, or inefficiency * * *. 5 U.S.C. § 5595(b)(2).  The
Office of Personnel Management has provided in section 550.705,
title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), that an employee's sepa-
ration for declining an assignment to another commuting area
satisfies the requirement of this provision since the separation is
an involuntary separation not by removal for cause on charges of
misconduct, delinquency or inefficiency.

     On May 10, 1979, the Regional Forester, Paci'            Re io Y
San Francisco, California,-denied Mr. Kruthkf's appeal of a decision
to reassign him from the Klamath National Forest to the Tahoe National
Forest.  Mr. Kruchko believed he was needed in his existing position
and relocation of his home and family would be a hardship.. He filed
a grievance against the proposed reassignment with the Director of
Personnel, U.S. Forest Service, on May 24, 1979. The Regional
Forester by letter of June 27, 1979, informed Mr. Kruchko:

     I am not willing to rescind your reassignment until
     the grievance you have initiated to the Washington

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most