About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196908 1 (1980-05-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadihf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                            THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  DECISION       .OF.          s THE UN1ITED       STATES
                             WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548




 FILE:   B-196908                  DATE:   May 28, 1980

 MATTER OF:   Warren  L. Shipp - Real Estate Expense7


 DIGEST:   Employee was  transferred back to former duty station
           and was reimbursed expenses of selling former resi-
           dence there even though he did not contract to sell
           former residence until after he had been notified of
           retransfer. Under Beryl C. Tividad, B-182572,
           October 9, 1975, he may retain amount reimbursed.
           However,  Tividad is overruled prospectively. Here-
           after, transferred employee is under same obligation
           to avoid unnecessary expenses as an employee whose
           transfer is cancelled and is entitled to only those real
           estate expenses which he has incurred prior to notice
           of retransfer and those which cannot be avoided.

   We  have been asked to determine whether an employee may
be reimbursed real estate exoenses in connection with the sale
of his residence at his former duty station where he contracted
to sell that residence after he had been notified that he was to be
retransferred to that same duty station.

    Mr. W. Smallets, Finance and Accounting Officer, National
Security Agency (NSA), has asked us whether Mr. Warren L.
Shipp is entitled to real estate sale expenses. Mr. Shipp, an
NSA  employee, was transferred from Fort Meade, Maryland,
to Princeton, New Jersey, in August 1978, and was authorized
relocation expenses, including real estate transaction expenses.
He was notified April 25, 1979, that he was to be transferred
back to Fort Meade and he was retransferred to his former duty
station in August 1979. On May 9, 1979, Mr. Shipp entered into
a contract to sell his former Maryland residence and on
August 8, 1979, he submitted a claim for expenses associated
with the sale of that residence. His claim for real estate ex-
penses was paid in the amount of $4, 671. 60. In the following
week he submitted a claim for real estate expenses incurred in
conjunction with the purchase of a residence in the Fort Meade
area.  The record does not indicate that Mr. Shipp's claim
for real estate purchase expenses has been paid. Based on our
holding in B-167141, July 23, 1969, Mr. Smallets asks whether
Mr.  Shipp should be required to reimburse the Government the
$4, 671. 60 paid as real estate sale expenses.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most