About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-198237 1 (1980-05-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadigj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

t'-. -U


DECISION





FILE:   B-198237


MATTER


DIGEST:


I 2j7LL~


        THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
        OF   THE UNITED STATES
        WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548
L NITEV


OF:  Alex Zazow   Attendant for Handicapped Employee-
    Travel  Expensue o  rme   Change-of-Static-

 Employee who is handicapped by blindness and cannot
 travel alone claims travel expenses and per diem
-entitlement for an attendant in connection with offi-
cially  approved permanent change of station. Trans-
portation expenses and per diem expenses incurred by
attendant  to handicapped employee may be allowed as
necessary  to the conduct of official business and con-
sistent with explicit congressional intent to employ
the  handicapped and prohibit discrimination based on
physical handicap.


     Kenyon I. Dugger, Jr., an authorized certifying officer for the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has requested a decision as to whether
transportation and per diem expenses may be reimbursed for the
services of an attendant accompanying Mr. Alex Zazow, a handicapped
IRS employee, to his new post of duty and on a house-hunting trip.

     Mr. Zazow is blind and requires the assistance of a companion
when traveling to an unfamiliar area. The report states that
Mr. Zazow was authorized to effect a change in his post of duty from
Baileys Crossroads, Virginia, to Denver, Colorado, under Form 4253,
Authorization for Moving Expense, No. TPS-79-8, which provided for
transportation to the new post of duty and also a house-hunting trip
in connection with the official change of station. The authorization
was for payment of these expenses to Mr. Zazow as a single employee.
In August 1979, Mr. Zazow filed a travel voucher claiming reimburse-
ment for travel expenses incurred in effecting his change of post of
duty and for a house-hunting trip for both himself and the attendant
who accompanied him. The IRS disallowed the expenses of the attendant
because Mr. Zazow's relocation orders did not specify an attendant to
accompany him, and IRS regulations only address payment of expenses
for an attendant when accompanying a handicapped employee to and from
temporary duty stations.

     In our decision in H. W. Schulz, B-187492, May 26, 1977, we
allowed travel expenses incurred by an attendant for a handicapped
consultant in connection with temporary duty travel. While noting
that the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR) (FPMR 101-7) (May 1973)


&e3*


0


/


)I ?wN   I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most