About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196328 1 (1980-04-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiep0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                                THE   CGMPTROLLER GENERAL
                       /         OF   THE    UNITED      BTATES
                             /4:WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548




   FILE:   B-196328                    DATE:   April 22, 1980

   MATTER OF: Charles L. Jones -(Administratively Uncontrollable
                   Overtim1.

   DIGEST: U.S. Deputy   Marshal, who received premium pay for
              administratively uncontrollable overtime (AUG) on an
              annual basis under 5 U.S.C. § 5545(c)(2), is not enti-
              tled to additional pay at the time and one-half rate
              for AUO. Premium pay for AUO is current pay for the
              pay periods when it was received, although the rate
              was based on AUG performed in a prior computation
              period. Also, premium pay for AUO is in lieu of all
              other forms of compensation for irregular or occasional
              overtime.

     The issue is whether Charles L. Jones, U.S. Deputy Marshal, is
entitled to pay at the time and one-half overtime rate for administra-
tively uncontrollable overtime (AUG) for the final three pay periods
before the U.S. Marshal's Service discontinued the authorization of
premium pay for AUO on an annual basis pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 5545(c)(2)
(1976).

     Mr. Jones performed AUO during the three pay periods between
September 10 and October 21, 1978, the date on which the U.S. Marshals
Service terminated the authorization of premium pay for AUO. He
received premium pay for AUO during these pay periods based upon pro-
jected AUO hours performed during a computation period of 12 pay
periods ending before September 10, 1978. A weekly average AUO compu-
tation for a 5-day week was calculated by totaling all of Mr. Jones'
hours of irregular or occasional overtime during the computation
period.  During the period between September 10 and October 21, 1978,
Mr. Jones received premium pay equal to a percentage of his basic pay
based on the weekly average AUO during the computation period. This
method of payment for AUO was specified in Department of Justice
Order (DOJ) 1551.4A, August 1, 1975, paragraphs 9 through 12.

     Mr. Jones believes that because of a three pay period lag between
the end of the computation period and the eligibility period that AUO
performed during the three pay periods in question remains unpaid.
However, the Assistant Attorney General for Administration states that
premium pay for AUO is current pay although the rate was determined on
the basis of overtime worked during a prior period of time (the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most