About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-139703 1 (1980-03-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadicm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                           `<HE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
                           OF TWE UNJTED STATES
                           ' WASHINGTON,        .C.  20548

                           iAl 6-tch' 05'

  FILE: B-139703                  DATE:  March 21, 1980

  MATTER   OF: Payment of court-appointed expert witness--criminal
               proceeding

 DIGEST:   Compensation of expert witnesses, appointed by the Court
           under Rule 706, Federal Rules of Evidence (Pub. L. No.
           93-595), in criminal proceedings is payable from Justice
           Department appropriations, as a litigation expense.

    The Director, Administrative Office of the United State Courts
(Administrativ Office), has requested our decision on theroper
source of funds for payment of a $24, 200 fee of Mr. Reynolds Couch.
Mr. Couch wa  appointed by th6 court under Rule 706, Federal Rules
of Evidence (FRE) (Pub. L. No. 93-595, 88 Stat. 1938), to make an
appraisal of 15 properties subject to forfeiture under the provisions
of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1976) in a criminal proceeding, United
States v. Thevis (No. CR78-180 A, N.D. Ga.). For reasons set
forth below, we conclide that Department of Justice appropriations
should be used for such payment.

    Mr. Couch was appointed in June, 1978, by the Honorable
Charles A. Moye, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Georgia, to make an appraisal for the court of various
properties subject to forfeiture in the above-named criminal pro-
secution. 18 U.S. C. 5 1963. A voucher for the appraisal services,
totalling $24, 200 was approved by the court and submitted to the
Administrative Office for payment. However, payment was de-
layed because the Administrative Office and the Department of
Justice (Justice) disagreed over which agency should make pay-
ment.  To resolve this difference, the Administrative Office
qu et  this decision.

   Subsequently, the District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia issued an order reciting that Mr. Couch was appointed pur-
suant to Rule 706 and directing Justice to pay the fee. In order to
expedite payment to Mr. Couch, Justice and the Administrative
Office reached an agreement under which (1) Justice paid the $24, 200
fee and (2) the Administrative Office will reimburse Justice if it
should be decided that Judiciary appropriations should have been
used.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most