About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193573 1 (1979-12-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhuw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                           Th   . DE.MPTROLLER   GENERAL
DECISION      OF THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548
                   NrITE


193573


DATE:     December 19, 1979


MATTER


DIGE


OF:  Saint Lawrence Seaway Development  Corporation -
    DStatus of Funds as 'Appropriate


57Z


ST: Saint Lawrence Seaway Development  Corporation requests
    that GAO reverse its holding (B-193573, January 8, 1979),
    that user fees derived from its corporate activities are
    appropriated funds. Based on its interpretation of language
    in its annual appropriation act, its enabling legislation, and
    the Government Corporation Control Act, the Seaway Cor-
    poration contends that funds available to the Corporation
    are non-appropriated funds. GAO  concludes that the
    Corporation's funds are appropriated but by virtue of the
    Corporation's enabling legislation, are exempt from many
    statutory restrictions on the use of appropriated funds.
    B-193573, January 8, 1979, affirmed, as modified.


    This decision is in response to a request by the General Counsel
of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation for review
and reconsideration of our decision, Matter of Applicability of FY
1979 5. 5 percent pay increase ceiling to employees of Saint Lawrence
Seaway Development  Corporation (B-193573, January 8, 1979), in
which we held that the Corporation's funds are appropriated funds,
despite the fact that the source of such funds is user fees. (The
General Counsel agrees with the result of the decision, that
Corporation employees are not subject to the 5. 5 percent pay in-
crease ceiling, and that holding is not here at issue.) Professor
Harold Seidman, Department  of Political Science, University of
Connecticut, has also offered his views in support of the position
that the Corporation is not subject to the laws applicable to appro-
priated funds.

    The General Counsel, supported in general by Professor Seidman,
contends that our holding is in direct conflict with the underlying
principles of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Act (33 U.S.C. 5 981 et seq.),
the Government Corporation Control Act (31 U.S.C. § 841 et seT.T hd
the purposes which a Government corporation is designed fT serve.
He further contends that our holding is contrary to the plain language
of the provisions of the annual Department of Transportation Appro-
priations Act.



                            -1-


11112)CO


FILE:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most