About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193727 1 (1979-11-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhsz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                   1THE COMPTROLLER GENEAL
  0-EC  ISIM-MV.           OF  TH'E* UNMITED   STATES`
                           WASHINGTON, O .C. 20548




  FILE: B-193727                DATE:  November 21, 1979

  MATTER   OF: Y. W. & T. Metal Corporation - Reconsider-

St_            at ion                   't4/
  DI G3E ST:                                          4

       Contractor who enters into undertaking
       to transport property in interstate
       commerce must possess appropriate
       operating authority in its own name
       from Interstate Commerce Commission.

       Y. W. & T. Metal Corporation (Y. W. & T.), in effect,
  has requested reconsideration of our decision of May 18,
  1979, B-193727, in which we held that a transportation
  contract with Y. W. & T. for the movement of Government
  property from California to Arizona was contrary to the
  Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. 1, et seq. and illegal,
  since Y. W. & T. was not authorized by the Interstate, 0C 00409
  Commerce Commission (I.C.C.) to transport-property in
  Interstate commerce.  We also held, however, that on pres-
  entation of a properly certified and supported Public
  Voucher For Transportation Charges, SF 1113, Y. W. & T.
  could be paid on the basis of quantum meruit the reasonable
  value of the services rendered measured by the usual rates
  of duly authorized carriers for the same or similar
  service.

       On request for reconsideration Y. W. & T. asserts,
  in pertinent part, that Y. W. & T. has a home base in
  Arizona, that its truck is licensed in Arizona, and that
  the service was pieced out to different carriers, some
  of whom had State or I.C.C. operating authority. These
  factors do not, however, cure the legal defect, and our
  prior decision is affirmed.

       Y. W. & T. undertook in its own name to transport
  Government property in interstate commerce from Barstow,
  California, to Casa Grande, Arizona, under Government
  bill of lading No. L-0097820 in 1974. If Y. W. & T.
  purported to contract as a motor carrier it was required
  by former section 206 of the Interstate Commerce Act,
  49 U.S.C. 306 (1976) to hold authority as a common carrier,
  or by former section 209, 49 U.S.C. 309 (1976), as a con-
  tract carrier.  A broker of transportation services was
  required by former section 211 of the Act, 49 U.S.C. 311

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most