About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193959 1 (1979-09-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhqb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: V                     -                   -              ..
                                     - -~             ~    - -~
   4
                                                             I I/i


DECISION





FILE:   B-193959


            THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
. ~   -. OF THE UNITED STATES
0           WASHINGTON. 0.C. 20548
    IT
       'fo   11Y6rZ '


DATE:   September 21, 1979


I I I I~~' A


MATTER OF: William L. Hurt and Walter Hayward


DIGEST:


Excepted service wage system employees with.veterans
readjustment appointments on intermittent basis may
receive temporary promotions and backpay under Turner-
Caldwell decisions for overlong details to higher
grade General Schedule positions in competitive service
if details were part of documented training programs.
Civil Service Commission held prior approval by it was
not necessary under such programs and 5 C.F.R. § 307.106
permits promotion of such employees who meet qualifi-
cation standards. Also, General Schedule and wage
system employees should be treated in like manner.
Temporary promotions and backpay would commence on 121st
calendar day of intermittent details, not 121st workday.


V
,sJ


     Janice K. Mendenhall, Controller-Director of Administration,
General Services Administration (GSA), has requested an advance
decision concerning the claims of William L. Hurt and Walter Hayward
to retroactive temporary promotions and backpay based upon details to
higher-level positions for periods of more than 120 days.

     Both claimants received wage board veterans readjustment appoint-
ments in the excepted service and were detailed to higher grade
positions in the competive service. Also, Mr. Hurt was employed on
an intermittent basis. The Controller-Director asks these specific
questions concerning the claims:

     1.  Was our intent in the Turner-Caldwell decisions, 55 Comp.
Gen. 539 (1975) and 56 id. 427 (1977), to allow such employees retro-
active temporary promotions and backpay beginning with the 121st day
of the detail if approval had not been obtained from the Civil Service
Commission (CSC) to extend the detail?

     2.  If the answer to question 1 is affirmative, are General
Schedule and wage system employees treated in a like manner?

     3.  Does the 120-day period of an allowable detail permitted by
the Federal Personnel Manual, Chapter 300, mean calendar days so that
an intermittent employee would be entitled to backpay on the 121st
calendar day of an overlong detail?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most