About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189756 1 (1979-06-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhhg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                    THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
           DECISION           .     OF  THE   UNITED STATES
                                    WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548



           FILE:       B-189756          DATE:  June 7, 1979

           MATTER   OF:    Murphy Brothers, Inc.--
                           Reconsideration

I          DIG   T

           1.   Authority under FPR § 1-2.406-3 in executive
                agencies to determine whether a mistake in
                bid case is doubtful and therefore should be
                referred to GAO does not foreclose GAO from
                reviewing that determination as well as agency
                determination regarding sufficiency of bid-
                der's evidence.

           2.   Where bidder only requests permission to
                correct bid price, bidder may alternatively
                be allowed to withdraw its bid if evidence
                is clear and convincing only as to the mis-
                take, but not as to the intended bid.


                The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requests
           that we reconsider our decisions, Murphy Brothers, Inc.,
           B-189756, March 8, 1978, 78-1 CPD 182 and 58 Comp.
           Gen. 185 (1978), 78-2 CPD 440, in which we held that
           Murphy Brothers, Inc. (Murphy) was entitled to relief
           for a mistake in its bid on contract DOT-FH-10-3148.

                In the original decision, we held that no contract
           was consummated at the award price because an error in
           Murphy's bid had been brought to FHWA's attention after
           bid opening but before award. FHWA refused to permit
           correction or withdrawal of the bid. Because rescis-
           sion was not feasible, we granted Murphy relief on a
           quantum valebant or quantum meruit basis.

                In the first reconsideration, we held that FHWA
           should have referred the doubtful matter to us for
           determination as to whether withdrawal could be al-
           lowed under less stringent criteria applied by this
           Office pursuant to decisions of the Court of Claims.
           We additionally held that FHWA's authority under FPR
           S 1-2.406-3 (1964 ed., amend. 165) to determine mistake

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most