About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-194122 1 (1979-06-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhgy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





DECISION





FILE:   B-194122

MATTER OF: Jc


         THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
         OF   THE UNITED  TATE
         WAASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548
tN1TEV                              O


I


)ph


5  1979


              DA      June I I=: J 11

H. Nixon III -zRetroactive Promotion7


DIGEST:


                                46-1 ,66o020~
Employee of Social Security Administration was
recommended for promotion with recommended date
of December 21, 1975. The approving official
approved the promotion but with an effective
date of January 4, 1976. Employee may not be
retroactively promoted to December 21, 1975,
since approving official had discretion to
promote at any subsequent date.


     Mr. Joseph H. Nixon III, an employee of the Department of
Health, Education and Welfare's Social Security Administration
(SSA), has appealed our Claims Division's denial of his claim
for a retroactive promotion.

     Mr. Nixon, a Hearings and Appeals Analyst in the Bureau of
Hearings and Appeals (BHA), aleges that his promotion from the
GS-12 to GS-13 grade was improperly delayed for 2 weeks due to
an administrative error. He filed a grievance on the matter
with his agency but it was denied.

     The basis for Mr. Nixon's claim is that the Request for
Personnel Action  (SF-52) recommended his promotion with an
effective date of December 21, 1975, and that all journal actions
in the Personnel Office were completed on December 3, 1975, and
the Executive Director of BRA initialed the SF-52 on the same
date.  He argues that the official vested with authority to pro-
mote had approved such promotion effective on December 21, 1975.
He states that the effective date was later altered or changed
and that delay of his promotion until January 4, 1976, was im-
proper and constituted administrative error entitling him to a
retroactive promotion with backpay.

     It is the position of the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals,
however, that the BHA Personnel Off _er was the orticial with
authority to appoint Mr. Nixon to the higher grade, and not any
other official in BHA. In this regard the findings and recom-
mendations of the Employee Appeals Examiner who heard Mr. Nixon's
grievance is relied upon by management. The grievance examiner
stated:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most